The investigation of Ionut Anghel's death has been finalized, the culprits are to be prosecuted.

Prosecutors from the Department of forensic investigations completed the investigation in the case know generically as "child killed by strays" and ordered the indictment of the Public Domain Administration Sector 2 Bucharest and SC TEI Residential SRL Bucharest for manslaughter, provided for and punishable under Article 178, paragraph 2 of the Penal Code of 1969, with the application of Article 5, paragraph 1 of the new Penal Code, reads a press release from the Prosecutor's Office, from the High Court Of Justice.

In the same case Constantin Ciorascu was also put on trial for manslaughter, punishable under article 192, paragraph 2, from the Penal code.

"There's a difference that exists in terms of legal classification of the offense of manslaughter incriminating legal persons and that of manslaughter incriminating natural persons. This is based on the sequence of criminal laws that intervened from the time the offense occurred until now. So, if the individual liability limits were kept by the new Penal Code (imprisonment from 2 to 7 years), the criminal liability of the legal person has seen a growth of the fine limits, under the provisions of the new Penal Code, prosecutors said.

In the case of Constantin Ciorascu, we used the individual liability from the new Penal Code and in terms of the legal person's liability we applied the exception that derives from the  principle of the most favorable criminal law enforcement.

Prosecutors show that in the indictment sent to the court, the Administration of the Public Domain, sector 2, Bucharest, has not taken adequate measures concerning boundary fencing or delimitation of the Tei park area from the vacant land in the immediate vicinity, which allowed the passing of Ionut Anghel and his brother into "a wild area and created the conditions for their unhindered entry on a private property, without fencing, guarded by seven dogs, whose attacks led to the death of the minor A.I.C.".

In the case of Tei Residential SRL Bucharest company and its manager, Constantin Ciorascu, it must be retained that "they did not provide the organizational framework to prevent the dog atack on the minor A.I.C, did not maintain the integrity of the fence for keeping the company dogs exclusively withing the fenced perimeter of the firm, and the obligations arising from the law relating to the ownership of dogs, including those dangerous or aggressive, circumstances that led to the death of the minor A.I.C."

The case was sent to the court of law in Sector 2, Bucharest. Ionut Anghel, four years old, died on September 2, 2013, after being attacked by dogs on a land near Tei Park.

Death was caused by external hemorrhage, with hundreds of wounds being found on it's body, said on the 3rd of September 2013, for Mediafax, the doctor who did the autopsy, Abdo Salem, from the National Institute of Forensic Medicine. The doctor stated that only the child's sole didn't have  any plagues, the rest of the body having hundreds of dog bites.

The case of Ionut Anghel's death was opened on the 3rd of September 2013, and a day after the investigation was taken over by the prosecutors from the supreme court, who have done the investigations regarding manslaughter.

The investigators have heard in this case, among others, the parents and the grandmother of Ionut Anghel, Razvan Bancescu, project coordinator at ASPA, Carmen Secareanu, president of the Kaleidoscope Association, Lavinia Mirela Nica, ex-volunteer of Kaleidoscope Association, Marcela Pisla, president of the "Cutu, cutu" Association, Constantin Ciorascu, the owner of the land where Ionut Anghel was killed by dogs and Octavian Sandu, the man who brought Ionut Anghel's brother to his grandmother, in Tei Park.

Six dogs were seized in September 2nd, 2013, from the firm's property on Tuzla street, near Tei park, where Ionut Anghel was killed by dogs. One of them, who had blood on his nose, was sterilized by ASPA and adopted by the Kaleidoscope Foundation in 2008, said Razvan Bancescu.

Policemen fined in september 2013, the SC Tei Residential SRL company, which manages the land where Ionut Anghel was killed by dogs. Representatives of the company were fined 2000 lei(aprox. 450 euros)  because they didn't have a security plan for the property, police sources told Mediafax.

Also, the man guarding the property was fined 300 lei (aprox. 65 euros) because he was not qualified to provide security services.

Images captured by camers in Tei Park on september 2nd 2013, before Ionut Anghel was found dead, aired on september 19th in the media. Ionut Anghel and his 6  year old brother were seen while playing and running on an alley in the park, their grandmother doesn't appear on the recording. At one point Ionut's brother is brought in the park by a man. This man goes with the child to a security guard, and after a few seconds the three men were seen headed to where the children's grandmother would have been.

After a few minutes, the man who brought the boy appears in the video while moving toward the park's exit. At around 11:30, Ionut was found killed by dogs on a private property near Tei park.

After the images where shown by the media, the investigating prosecutor ordered the seizing of the images captured by the security cameras in Tei park.

Prosecutors have questioned Octavian Sandu, as a witness, the man who took Ionut Anghel's brother to his grandmother in Tei park.

Octavian Sandu, said, on his way out from the Prosecutor's office, that on september 2nd 2013 he saw  Ionut's brother on the street and that he was scared. He took him and brought him to his grandmother in Tei park. He mentioned that he approached the boy after seeing he was crying, realizing that something wrong happened. He said he found out that there was another child that got lost when he brought Ionut's brother to his grandmother.

source: http://www.realitatea.net/cazul-ionu-ancheta-privind-decesul-lui-ionut-este-finalizata-dosarul-va-fi-trimis-in-instanta_1403961.html

Official sources: stray dogs not killed Ionut

Translated from original link here.

Official sources quoted by Antena 3 (which takes a story DCNews - Similar information appeared in other media) claim that Ionut Anghel's death was not caused by stray dogs bites are on private property located at about 1 km from Linden Park . According to sources quoted, DNA samples taken from the 6 stray dogs were not found when analyzes were performed on the body of the deceased child. drinkable news here .

What are they hiding from the IML

Very interesting (and suspect) was the reaction of the IML. The coroner who performed the autopsy on the deceased child, Abdo Salem, denied the information given by the sources quoted by several media. But beware expression Salem Abdo doctor: "We can not deny that his brother Ionut saw those little dramatic scenes attacked by several dogs." A statement that basically has no coverage medicalo Criminology, and based on the statements of a minor six years, in the first instance did not say anything about the area full of wild vegetation homleşi abodes of his whereabouts on the day of the tragic incident.

Another statement of Dr. Salem is contrary to what they said on TV news posts IML other officials, two days after the event. Salem Abdo now says that " about sampling AND I do not know anything because I have not harvested it! ". But news channels, two days after the tragic event, INL officials have clearly stated that DNA evidence will receive the 6 dogs dental configuration and only after analysis, will give a report stating whether the death was caused by that dog bites . It seems that Dr. Abdo Salem forgot this detail.

A child was bitten by dogs. The teacher sent for trial

Translated from the original link here.

A teacher at a kindergarten in Timis was prosecuted . She is accused of injury , after , in January 2012 , a child in kindergarten , which I have carefully went and got one of the unit on private property where he was bitten by dogs. The child had injuries that have put their lives in danger.

Timisoara Court of Appeals prosecutors sent her to court for the offense of grievous bodily harm by negligence according adsa.ro. The case is very similar to that of Ionut Anghel , child bitten by dog found near a park in Bucharest. The child was in the care of the kindergarten educator at the park was in the care of grandparents . If Ionut Anghel , guilty, until this point in the investigation, were found land and employees of ADP Sector 2 . Child protection is not considered when Ionut that Grandma had any liability .

The teacher has not fulfilled its obligation to monitor

Prosecutors said that the teacher " has not fulfilled its obligation to monitor the victim DBG , which led by leaving it and entering kindergarten without the law, private property protected by dogs , where he was attacked by them ." Again we see the resemblance. Ionut , unattended , came on private property , where he was bitten by dogs.

The child from Timis found a guard

The child was bitten by dogs and had injuries that have put their lives in danger. Police were told by the teacher about the disappearance of the child, who fled while other kids were ready to be taken by the parents. Boy's grandmother had to take him to kindergarten , but late. It was found by a security guard of a farm , who observed that it was bitten by a pack of dogs.

Ionut Anghel’s body could be unearthed

Original link. Click here.

Ionut Anghel’s body could be unearthed… ADP’s Director of sector 2 and the owner of the land where the body of Ionut Anghel was found, as well as representatives of SC Tei Residential SRL, were called last Tuesday at the Investigator’s Office and informed that I file was opened accusing them in connection with the death of the little boy. The accusation is: killing through fault (?I) According to some sources of the Prosecutor’s Office, both the General Director of ADP sector 2, Cristian Lemnaru as well as Constantin Ciorascu, he who holds double function in this case – administrator of Tei Residential Company and shareholder of the Association – declined to give any statements, intending to declare their point of view before the Court only. At this stage of the investigations, when the proceedings just began, the prosecutors are able to ask for the unearthing of the body even without the child’s parents consent. Our sources reveal that the decision to unearth the body will be taken in the following few days, when the prosecutors intent to assess, in a special sitting, the need for a new forensic analysis, which would have to corroborate with some criminal clues from the tests already taken from the child’s body. We heard last Monday afternoon that the investigators invited the child’s parents at the Investigator’s Office. In the circumstances and as advised by their lawyer Bogdan Barbucean, Ionut Anghel’s parents gave up temporarily their intention of opening a civil case demanding 1 million Euro, an issue which can be reintroduced only after the prosecutors brought the case of those indicted for this tragedy into Court. 

Breaking News. Ionut Anghel's Grandmother Investigated For Negligence.

THE service for the protection of children Bucharest Sector 2 , has FINALLY filled in a request to the Police to start investigating Ionut's Anghel grandmother for Negligence...

Click here for report.

Shocking Discoveries in the Romanian Scandal

Original Source - DC News. Translation below. 

Discoveries near Parcul Tei Bucharest, where little Ionut died . The path taken by the the children ( 4 years old Ionut and his 6 years old brother Andrei ) retraced by people, only three days after the tragedy.

The wasteland near Parcul Tei is a place people could not image that a place like this can really exist in a city,let alone the Capital City. The first person who retraced the children' path made some shocking discoveries. Beside 3 m high bushes , rotten cadavers of dead dogs, used syringes , and also most incredible things dumped 200 m from the place Ionut has been found : white gloves and white uniforms full of blood.

Looking for answers, Daniel Tomescu retraced the path only three days after the tragedy. The bushes are very high, the ditch is very very steep. Even the adults who took that path had difficulties and have fallen. Climbing it up was out of question. They continued their walk in the Capital's jungle.

Dangers where everywhere : they could have slipped in the lake, they could have injured themselves while climbing down that steep ditch, they could have touched the poison placed there for the rats, which they found near the lake,, they could have got hurt with the syringes found there, which could have been infected with HIV or Hep.C. A bit higher, very thick trees which keep shade...Would two children take that dark path, after they climbed down that steep ditch ?

And they keep on coming : more shocking news from Romania

Reverse of the situation in the case of the death of little Ionut . The cadaver of a dog found nearby, belonged to a dog used in dog fights ( I repeat, dog fights are ILLEGAL in Romania )

The investigators continue to sustain that the dog found ( then ) near the place where the child died was not a fight dog.

Original Source - Antena 3

UPDATE : The investigators took the cadaver of a dead dog from near the place where the tragedy happened. This was a Pit Bull." We have been announced, by a fisherman, that there is the cadaver of a dog in the lake. We have seen it. We called the prosecutor office. They came here to take it and perform the nechropsy. We want to see if there is any connection between it and Ionut ".

"I think the animals has been killed, maybe he lost a fight or maybe he attacked someone" he probably died about three weeks ago " - said Kuki Barbuceanu, from Vier pfoten.

UPDATE : The man who found Andrei and brought him back in the park to his grandmother has been questioned by the prosecutors, as a witness , on Monday. Octavian Sandu declared that he found Andrei on the street, took him back to his grandmother and only then he found out that there was also another child who got lost.

After his identity has been revealed he announced that he will communicate with the media only through a lawyer.

And they keep on coming MORE and NEW shocking revelations from Romania ( Sept.20,2013 ) New shocking revelations surface " Two weeks before Iunut's death, two more children were bitten ".

English Translation of Original CanCan.ro

A witness who wants to remain anonymous, made some mind blowing declarations, about what happened the day Ionut died.

The man who works in the vicinity of the park, sayd that the owner of the secutiry company "Elias Bucurica " has forbidded all  employees to give any statements about this case.

Who does not obey his orders will be fired, said the witness. The same thing was told by the security guard who helped Andrei get back to his grandmother.

Based on "Access Direct " he is afraid he will lose his job, thus he prefers not to say anything.

"The owner of that security firm, today, around 1 pm, gave this order : if any on the guards gives any statement, he will be fired, he will also be fired if he gives hiw pfone number to the media or anybody else. They are not allowed to say anything " declared our anonymous source.

This person told us more shocking details, about an incident which happened in the same Park, two weeks before Ionut's death.

From the yard of the Restaurant which is in the park, two dogs trained for fighting got out and chased two Rroma kids ( gypsies ). These dogs belongs to the owner of the restaurant. They only bit the children. The surveiallance camera facing the tennis court, is not there anymore since that incident. There are only 6 surveillance cameras left, from the 42 which normaly should have been there. " said the witness 

The security guard on duty the day Ionut was killed, told to keep quiet." We must protect ourselves , brother, we must not say anything."

English translation from original source here.

"Unbelievable : The security guard on duty the day Ionut was killed , told to keep quiet : " " We must protect ourselves , brother, we must not say anything." 

It seems that nobody has to know what really happened, with Ionut, the 4 years old who died on Sept.2, 2013 in Racul Tei, Bucharest. 

Even if there were witnessed who could help to solve the mystery in Ionut's case, it seems that the security guards on duty that day, will not say anything. The chief ot the Security firm " Elias" which employs the security guard seen in these photos, allegedly har threatened his employees that if they give any testimony, or talk to anybody or the media they will be fired.

" I do not know the man who brought the child back. He came from outside the park He was a good man, he brought the child because he found him outside the park. Andrei was crying because he was scared of what he saw...I don't know what Elias is doing in all of this. We must take care. We must not say anything. this is what he said. Why do you think he moved me ? in order to avoid the declarations. Who knows how people will interpret them ." declared the security guard quoted by Antena 1

CCTV Footage of Ionut

 The last few weeks and the furore concerning Romanian stray dogs occurred due to the death of a four year old boy. After accusing strays of his death, it turned out that there was no DNA match between the boy and the stray dogs. It then turned out that there was a witness. Anyway, here are some CCTV footage obtained by Cancan. The link to the original story is here. What follows is a English translation.

Images filmed staggering shortly before being killed Ionut: Ionut Andrei running through the park completely unsupervised

Please visit the website to view the full film.

Cancan got some pictures baffling that nobody has seen before. Tei park's cameras captured the last moments of the play the two boys before they cross the fence to left field

There are pictures with a strong emotional impact. The boys family Anghel, Ionut, 4 years and Andrew, 6 years old, in a moment of joy and play, a moment that is not predicted by any tragedy that was to follow. Oddly, in shooting with little boys, grandmother missing. One of the rooms located in the middle of the park Tei, has captured images of the two, running alone on an area big enough, without being in any way supervised.

E at 9.21. Andrew, the eldest first appears. Run fast enough on the main alley, beside the fountain. Too fast for his brother, only 4 years ago that remained serious. The small beam enters the camera almost a minute away from his brother, who is well ahead. Tiny and he runs as fast as possible, but it can get, and when no longer sees his brother stops at the intersection of two alleys confused, not knowing where to go excact. Finally we spotted times, great times we cried and then, slightly insecure resume running.

In these images, the boys head to the other end of the park - from the area that supposedly came out. Most likely continued to run until they made a complete turn around wells and the end came to the playground fence bordered by broken fence that had to enter a "different world". In the world, small and insecure, confused and tired may have been lost.

In the minutes that pass by image, the park animals. Parents, grandparents accompanying their children or grandchildren, mothers walk their babies in strollers, young go hand in hand holding. Granny has two brothers, most likely, in the area where he sat when he arrived at the park. And that, according to witnesses, it's not the same as indicated in the reconstruction of old on tv, but to the center of the park, just opposite. Far beyond the playground. 

Starting at 9.23, Anghel boys no longer appear on any of the nine cameras located in the middle of the park and the "cover" a good part of the main driveway. No it's not seen their grandmother. Even after 10.30 when supposedly old has noticed the absence and went to look for them. 

Barely 11 and 20, make their appearance in the middle of the two guards, who once supravegeasera park at their posts observation. It sits in the center and looked in all directions. It should be noted that the park is very well maintained and guarded, both in areas with swings, as well as the main or side alleys. There have been cases where children have lost their parents, but were quickly spotted. Linden Park is not necessarily a complicated park and areas are large, with large openings. So at 11.20, two employees of the security company sits centrally and watch children carefully. It may be a coincidence, but it's possible that men of old have been announced as not find grandchildren.

Time 11.36. It's been 2 hours and 15 minutes after the boys were filmed by a surveillance camera. At that time, the room number 1, situated at the entrance of the park, it surprises Andrew, eldest son of the family Anghel. Go fast, accompanied by a tall, well-built, with dark hair. Young wear shorts, a white shirt and red plaid sneakers and I hand you the boy. Enter the park, the man sees the guards and headed directly toward them, and the images are captured inside the park Room 4 of the same angle where more than two hours ago, both boys had been filmed.

The man considered "key witness" in the investigation gestures showing it on the boy. The child remains a step back and wait, and the guards look the man in the gesture that is supposed to be my grandmother. An interesting aspect to be emphasized here. In the area where they stopped the man and child sprawl dog most likely of another man who stopped to talk with others. The boy does not seem to be afraid and sits near quadruped, waiting for adults to finish speaking.

The three men and Andrei turn then to the end of the park. State Bank that the grandmother and when arrived at the park. The area where visibility is poor is old, but it may refer to the old men find her and I "teach" children. The same camera filming him the man who brought the child when, in less than three minutes after it left Andrew. He is young grandmother told about probably rebuked her saying that he found the child "just in Bamboo "(at Tuzla) and urged her to take care of him once. 's pretty obvious that the boy did not tell the rescuer or has a brother who has fallen prey to dogs and who remained on the land left. We can assume that the man would have called the police or even personally would have gone to look for the little guy. But he took the boy's hand and led him back into the park, where baiatl told her grandmother would expect. From oldies statements result even she did not know right away from Andrei Ionut what happened, but only after he calmed down, the boy told him that his brother was killed. Dogs.

Besides existing question marks in this terrible case amounted others. How long has it been, in fact, when the children were gone until she realized that her grandmother never return, running to the bank on which it stood? How could that little boy of four years, you see aabia running with his small feet - to cross such a trail through the wilderness, the moors, through an area where no adults not venture? How was it possible that both guys go down a ravine with a difference on more than three meters, inclined at 45 degrees. And then to wander through a dense forest, full of noise, garbage and carrion birds? 

How to Laguna Tei guards that they let Andrew take to the streets using their gate asked him how to come to such an area? And who is, after all, the man who saved Andrew? W e would have told him it would be perhaps very useful survey.

In tomorrow's edition will return with new details and images. Who we be introduced to the "key witness" who took on Andrew grandmother in the park and we can help you make contact with him or we may provide information about him is asked to contact us at the address or pont@cancan.ro telephone number 0741 226 226. Their website is here. 

Child was not killed by stray. See the result of DNA

Survey for 4 year old child killed in Linden Park brings out shocking details that can bedevil the current situation, that killed six little stray dogs. Sources inside the investigation told DC News that the existing data to Currently, DNA tests show that samples from wounds killed baby not found any DNA stray dog of the six accused would have killed Ionut. "We have argued from the beginning that the child was killed a fighting dog. It was impossible for him to make those dogs hurt child's body. And it was impossible after the attack, the dogs to sit still and give the queue. Any ethologist understood that dogs were not vinovaţi.Poate that one of her baby and have smelled blood on the fur, but as seen on TV, were the result of interference were not caused by a bite. It was a disinformation campaign, the enmity of the population. At this time, authorities are required to identify the dog's owner guilty battle that dragged the body to the place where it was found, "said the DC News President of the Federation for the Protection of Animals and the Environment. [ Original Source - click here] 

SHOCKING inversion in the case of the little boy mauled by dogs !

English version... of the Original Story in the local media.

SHOCKING inversion in the case of the little boy mauled by dogs !

The DNA tests show that he was NOT mauled by the stray dogs in that parc !

Full translation of the article : The investigation regarding the death of the 4 year old , due to dog bites, on Sept,2 , 2013, in Parcul Tei, revealed shocking details, which can overturn the present supposition, which stipulated that he was mauled to death by 6 stray dogs.

Inside sources declared for DeCe News, that, based on the data obtained until now, the DNA tests – done on the samples collected after the incident, that the wounds inflicted on the little boy, they did NOT find any DNA from those 6 dogs, accused for his death.

Thus, the theory that the little boy was killed by a dog trained for dog fighting, and then his body was placed where he was found, in order to blame the stray dogs, becomes more and more coherent.

This information needs to be confirmed officially, after more tests will be done.

Senator Marinescu : there was a dog trained for fight.

Former Senator, Marius Marinescu, President of FPAM, confirmed for DeCe News, this information, citing Police sources.

He also sustains that this hypothesis will be eventually confirmed and the entire hysteria against stray dogs was useless.

” I have sustained from the very beginning, that the little boy was killed by a dog trained fo fighting. It would have been impossible for the stray dogs to generate all those wounds on his body. It would have been impossible, that after such attack, those dogs to be so peaceful , stay quiet and wave their tails. Specialist in dog behavior understood from the beginning that those dogs were NOT GUILTY. Maybe one of them sniffed the boy while laying on the ground and got stained with blood, but those blood stains on the dog were not the results of biting the child. This was a misinformation campaign, to instigate and divide the population. AT this moment the authorities MUST find the owner of the dog trained for fights, and dragged the little boy to the place where he was found.” – declared Mr. Marinescu.

Grandmother admits to existence of witness.

Poster - Occupy For Animals. 

Ionut's grandmother, four-year boy killed by stray dogs , made ​​a stunning disclosure. The old woman, who accompanied the child to the park the day it was torn by dogs, announced the existence of a key witness. A man who is unavailable at this time, according to Romania TV . This young man could bring about the death of Ionut clarification.

 Ionut's grandmother, the boy killed by stray dogs, told them on Friday, prosecutors what happened, Monday, September 2, the day her grandson died. She said that after several minutes from the time they disappeared grandchildren, a young boy appeared with big, Andrei, whom he found near the Bamboo Club. Young is considered the key witness in the investigation, but it is nowhere to be found. The investigators ran without giving statements. Furthermore, a bizarre element emerged during the investigation. Instead they found the body of Ionut, investigators found, in addition to toys two brothers (two water pistols), a new ball, they do not own the boys. Ionut, aged 4 years, was killed by dogs in early September in Bucharest . And his brother, a 6 year old boy was bitten. According to Hall District 2, a tragic incident occurred on private land in the Tei.

Source - RTV